For Employers
Lower healthcare costs through employer collective purchasing
Southern Oregon employers can create more leverage together than they can alone. The goal is not just cheaper coverage. It is a smarter local strategy for costs, access, and long-term resilience.

The problem
Premiums keep rising faster than wages. Small and mid-sized employers absorb the pressure, shift it to employees, or reduce benefits. Meanwhile, larger entities usually have stronger bargaining power and better options.
The idea
A Southern Oregon purchasing alliance can pool employers and potentially other participating groups to negotiate from a position of shared volume rather than isolated weakness.
What we’re borrowing from Peak
Local leverage
Peak showed that a rural community does not have to accept whatever pricing structure it is handed. Organized demand changes leverage.
Carrier partnership
The model is not about becoming the insurer. It is about building enough bargaining power to structure better plans with carrier partners.
Real savings
Later analysis of Peak found roughly 13–17% lower premiums, driven primarily by lower negotiated prices rather than thinner benefits.
Why this matters here
This should feel like regional strategy, not a placeholder.
Employer healthcare decisions are emotional, financial, and operational. Stronger framing and clearer local context make the idea more credible and actionable.

Employer Collective Purchasing FAQ
Is this an insurance company?
No. The alliance model is about organizing better bargaining power and then working with carrier partners.
Who should participate?
Small and mid-sized employers are the clearest fit, but nonprofits, public entities, and self-insured groups may also benefit.
When would savings happen?
Only after enough participation exists to create leverage, negotiations are complete, and a viable carrier structure is in place.
Get the employer guide
Request the detailed proposal for the Southern Oregon Community Purchasing Alliance, including structure, rationale, and next-step thinking.
